From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31593-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21991 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2003 08:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21977 invoked by uid 71); 20 Mar 2003 08:36:01 -0000
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 08:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030320083601.21976.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Olivier Hainque <hainque@ACT-Europe.FR>
Subject: Re: ada/9953: Unsatisfied symbols: U_prep_frame_rec_for_unwind (c
Reply-To: Olivier Hainque <hainque@ACT-Europe.FR>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01323.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR ada/9953; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Olivier Hainque <hainque@ACT-Europe.FR>
To: John David Anglin <dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca>
Cc: charlet@ACT-Europe.FR, dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca,
	gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, bosch@gnat.com, hainque@ACT-Europe.FR
Subject: Re: ada/9953: Unsatisfied symbols: U_prep_frame_rec_for_unwind (c
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:26:02 +0100

 Hi John,
 
 John David Anglin wrote:
 > The hpux 10.20 build was successful with the enclosed patch.  Possibly,
 > the hpux test that you added should be after the DCE block but that
 > doesn't matter for hpux 10.
 
  Thanks for your feedback.
 
  We'll see how to integrate this in a way that will fit both the FSF and
  our internal trees.
 
 > I may try hpux 11 after I return from vacation.
 
  OK. I will check and report back, but it will in any case be interesting to
  get confirmation that it doesn't break on your side.
  
 > Thanks for your help,
 
  You are most welcome. Thanks for your help too.
 
  And, ... enjoy your vacation :)
 
  Olivier