From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1339 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2003 10:23:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1315 invoked by uid 48); 20 Mar 2003 10:23:12 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 10:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030320102312.1314.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ken@msr.mei.co.jp, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org From: rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ken@msr.mei.co.jp, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/10117: Problem of arm-elf-gcc. X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01325.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Problem of arm-elf-gcc. Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rearnsha Responsible-Changed-By: rearnsha Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Mar 20 10:23:12 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: . State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: rearnsha State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 20 10:23:12 2003 State-Changed-Why: That the assembler doesn't recognize this particular architecture variant is a problem with the assembler, not with the compiler. Both the compiler and assembler should accept -march=armv5e and that ought to be close enough for your needs. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10117