From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18765 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2003 18:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18751 invoked by uid 71); 20 Mar 2003 18:16:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 18:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030320181601.18750.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Thomas Witt Subject: Re: c++/9937: DR 176: Failure to lookup base class name when base is template specialization Reply-To: Thomas Witt X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01343.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/9937; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Thomas Witt To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, witt@ive.uni-hannover.de Cc: Subject: Re: c++/9937: DR 176: Failure to lookup base class name when base is template specialization Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:12:14 +0100 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9937 FWIW, I've got a reply from intel with regard to this problem. They agreed that the current behaviour is not standard compliant. The fact that icc behaves like gcc is not coincidence. They deliberately introduced this bug in icc on linux in order to be compatible with gcc. Thomas -- Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover voice: +49(0) 511 762 - 4273, fax: +49(0) 511 762-3001 http://www.ive.uni-hannover.de