From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21872 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2003 19:09:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21850 invoked by uid 48); 20 Mar 2003 19:09:33 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 19:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030320190933.21849.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: agesen@vmware.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mchen@vmware.com, mendel@vmware.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, agesen@vmware.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mchen@vmware.com, mendel@vmware.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10171: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] wrong code for inlined function X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01347.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: contant inline function result evaluated wrong New Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] wrong code for inlined function State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 20 19:09:33 2003 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. Here's the same program, slightly modified: ------------------------ inline int tag() { return 0; } int main() { int i; for (i = 0; i < (tag() ? 2 : 1); i++) printf("Hello1\n"); } -------------------------- The loop should be executed at least once, but isn't when compiled with -O2 on 3.2, 3.3 and mainline. It worked with 2.95, though, so this is a regression. A serious one, I'd say. W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10171