From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14894 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2003 02:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14880 invoked by uid 71); 21 Mar 2003 02:56:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 02:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030321025601.14879.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Benjamin Kosnik Subject: Re: libstdc++/10167: ieee_1003.1-[3.2/3.3 regression] 2001 locale specialisations on a RedHat8.0/glibc-2.3.2-4 system Reply-To: Benjamin Kosnik X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01365.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/10167; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Benjamin Kosnik To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, Andrew.Pollard@brooks.com, bkoz@redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, Andrew.Pollard@brooks.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/10167: ieee_1003.1-[3.2/3.3 regression] 2001 locale specialisations on a RedHat8.0/glibc-2.3.2-4 system Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 20:50:18 -0600 > Benjamin, at this point in the release cycle of 3.3 we > had better only fully qualifying (error as=20 > codecvt_base::error, etc.), instead of fully backporting > P=E9tur's rewrote, I think. Do you agree? > Thanks, Paolo. Yes, just make sure it passes make check-abi. thanks! benjamin