From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22461 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2003 23:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22436 invoked by uid 71); 21 Mar 2003 23:26:00 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030321232600.22435.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Mark Mitchell Subject: Re: optimization/2001: [3.2/3.3 regression] Inordinately long compile times in reload CSE regs Reply-To: Mark Mitchell X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01425.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/2001; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Mitchell To: Steven Bosscher Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, lucier@math.purdue.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, rth@redhat.com Subject: Re: optimization/2001: [3.2/3.3 regression] Inordinately long compile times in reload CSE regs Date: 21 Mar 2003 15:17:36 -0800 On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 14:58, Steven Bosscher wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2001 > > Richard Henderson posted a patch for this a week ago: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg01478.html > > I have successfully bootstrapped and regtested the patch on > i586-pc-linux-gnu. > Richard, I suppose you did the same on alpha? > > If so, can the patch be commited and the PR be closed? It looks fine to me. Richard, would you commit the patch if you do not have further reservations? Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC mark@codesourcery.com