From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31696-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27858 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2003 23:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27838 invoked by uid 71); 21 Mar 2003 23:36:00 -0000
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030321233600.27837.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: optimization/10185
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01426.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10185; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>, <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>,
   <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/10185
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:29:38 -0600 (CST)

 Actually, this bug was introduced between 2002-07-15 and 2002-08-01. Maybe 
 this short-cuts your search a little, Janis.
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth             email:            bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/