From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31697-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27956 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2003 23:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27860 invoked by uid 71); 21 Mar 2003 23:36:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030321233601.27859.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Subject: Re: optimization/10171: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] wrong code for inlined
 function
Reply-To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01427.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10171; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, mchen@vmware.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
	nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, agesen@vmware.com,
	mendel@vmware.com, jason@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/10171: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] wrong code for inlined
 function
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 00:33:02 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10171
 
 Jason,
 
  From your analysis, I would suspect that this PR is a duplicate
 of high-priority PR opt/8414. Is there any way to verify this?
 
 (Hoping you *do* have access to IA64 hardware ;-)
 
 Greetz
 Steven