From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31703-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12755 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2003 23:56:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12739 invoked by uid 71); 21 Mar 2003 23:56:00 -0000
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 23:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030321235600.12738.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/10171: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] wrong code for
 inlined function
Reply-To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01433.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10171; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, mchen@vmware.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, agesen@vmware.com,
   mendel@vmware.com
Subject: Re: optimization/10171: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] wrong code for
 inlined function
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 18:45:52 -0500

 On Sat, 22 Mar 2003 00:33:02 +0100, Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> wrote:
 
 >  From your analysis, I would suspect that this PR is a duplicate
 > of high-priority PR opt/8414. Is there any way to verify this?
 
 I don't think so; it doesn't look like the loop in 8414 only has a single
 iteration.
 
 Jason