From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24405 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2003 04:22:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24384 invoked by uid 48); 22 Mar 2003 04:22:53 -0000 Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 04:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030322042253.24383.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: arthur.baldwin@gd-ais.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, arthur.baldwin@gd-ais.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/10065: -pedantic has strange side effects; what is accepted in -std=c++98 X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01444.txt.bz2 List-Id: Old Synopsis: gcc/g++ issues error instead of warning on non-ISO array assignment. New Synopsis: -pedantic has strange side effects; what is accepted in -std=c++98 State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 22 04:22:53 2003 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed, kind of. First thing of course is that -pedantic converts errors into warnings. This has been shown in other PRs previously. That gcc doesn't allow array copies any more is a feature -- i.e., it is an extension of earlier versions that was abandoned. The thing with variably sized arrays: I think this is in deferrence to C99. However, it is also accepted by g++ with -std=c++98, which I think is wrong. W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10065