From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9858 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2003 05:02:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9835 invoked by uid 48); 22 Mar 2003 05:02:24 -0000 Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 05:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030322050224.9834.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, marcel@xcllnt.net, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, rth@redhat.com From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, marcel@xcllnt.net, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, rth@redhat.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10116: ce2: invalid merge of "join_bb" in the context of switch statements X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01454.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: ce2: invalid merge of "join_bb" in the context of switch statements Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth Responsible-Changed-By: bangerth Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 22 05:02:24 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Richard, this might be another simple one for you -- it contains a patch to ifcvt.c around some lines that you last changed with this patch revision 1.64 date: 2001/08/22 05:21:10; author: rth; state: Exp; lines: +6 -3 * ifcvt.c (find_if_block): Allow join_bb as EXIT. (merge_if_block): Handle fallout from same. The patch in the PR only affects 3 lines and has a testcase that should be simple to verify. Would you mind taking a brief look? Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10116