From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8444 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2003 08:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8430 invoked by uid 71); 22 Mar 2003 08:56:00 -0000 Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 08:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030322085600.8429.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Glen Nakamura Subject: Re: c/8224: Incorrect joining of signed and unsigned division Reply-To: Glen Nakamura X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01463.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/8224; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Glen Nakamura To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c/8224: Incorrect joining of signed and unsigned division Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 22:48:01 -1000 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8224 I'll need someone with CVS write access to commit the following patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-03/msg00949.html Approval is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg01966.html FYI, the patch I submitted to gcc-patches is equivalent to the one above except I mistakenly forgot the "or modulus" part of the comment. Hence, I think the patch sent to gcc-bugs should be committed. Thanks! -glen