From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31759-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28894 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2003 17:27:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28870 invoked by uid 48); 22 Mar 2003 17:27:09 -0000
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 17:27:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030322172709.28869.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gheorghe@us.ibm.com,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
From: bangerth@dealii.org
Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  gheorghe@us.ibm.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/4454: Suboptimal schedule following unroll of "reversed" loops in gcc
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01489.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: Suboptimal schedule following unroll of "reversed" loops in gcc

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 22 17:27:09 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    This is a report against a version of gcc that is now
    rather old. Can you say anything about whether the problem
    persists with newer versions of gcc, such as 3.2.2 or
    the version presently in CVS?
    
    Thanks
      Wolfgang

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4454