From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10299 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2003 18:00:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10280 invoked by uid 48); 22 Mar 2003 18:00:59 -0000 Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030322180059.10279.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jlquinn@optonline.net, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jlquinn@optonline.net, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/7713: Performance regression from gcc 2.95.3 X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01495.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Performance regression from gcc 2.95.3 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 22 18:00:59 2003 State-Changed-Why: Jerry, nobody seems to have ever looked at this report -- since otherwise they would have noticed that there's no testcase. Do you still have it so that we can attach it to the PR? Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7713