From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20551 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2003 18:38:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20531 invoked by uid 48); 22 Mar 2003 18:38:54 -0000 Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030322183854.20530.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: Richard_Pringle@XonTech.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, Richard_Pringle@XonTech.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/9668: Optimizing results in nans in output X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01502.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Optimizing results in nans in output State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 22 18:38:54 2003 State-Changed-Why: Doesn't happen with newer versions of gcc. Likely just a problem with RedHat's botched 2.96 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9668