From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31784-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30092 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2003 23:06:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 30073 invoked by uid 71); 22 Mar 2003 23:06:00 -0000
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 23:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030322230600.30072.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/10171: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] wrong code for inlined function
Reply-To: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01515.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10171; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, mchen@vmware.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, agesen@vmware.com,
   mendel@vmware.com, janis187@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: optimization/10171: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] wrong code for inlined function
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 15:01:50 -0800

 On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 11:22:32PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10171
 > 
 > Janis,
 > 
 > If the patch you identified really breaks stuff, then this PR should be 
 > in the
 > category "target", agree?
 
 Not necessarily; see Jason's comment about how -O2 does some unrolling.
 The identified patch might have merely made that change (as far as this
 problem is concerned).