From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31804-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8885 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2003 18:26:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8871 invoked by uid 71); 23 Mar 2003 18:26:00 -0000
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030323182600.8870.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Glen Nakamura <glen@imodulo.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/10125: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] Infinite loop caused by -O2
Reply-To: Glen Nakamura <glen@imodulo.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01534.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10125; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Glen Nakamura <glen@imodulo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/10125: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] Infinite loop caused by -O2
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:21:52 +0000

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10125
 > State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
 > State-Changed-By: rth
 > State-Changed-When: Sun Mar 23 02:57:36 2003
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     Not a bug.  Type-aliasing violation between "char **" and "unsigned **".
 
 Actually, the test case uses "signed char **" and "unsigned char **"...
 Not sure if that changes your analysis.
 
 - glen