From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6697 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2003 19:46:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6651 invoked by uid 71); 23 Mar 2003 19:46:01 -0000 Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 19:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030323194601.6650.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: optimization/10125: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] Infinite loop caused by -O2 Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01539.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/10125; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: Glen Nakamura Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10125: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] Infinite loop caused by -O2 Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 11:41:11 -0800 On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 06:21:52PM +0000, Glen Nakamura wrote: > > Not a bug. Type-aliasing violation between "char **" and "unsigned **". > > Actually, the test case uses "signed char **" and "unsigned char **"... > Not sure if that changes your analysis. No; the former was just a typo. r~