From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12368 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2003 04:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12347 invoked by uid 71); 24 Mar 2003 04:06:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 05:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030324040601.12346.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: drow@sources.redhat.com Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: c/9853: [3.2 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01559.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/9853; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Gabriel Dos Reis Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, mas@magica.systems.caltech.edu, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/9853: [3.2 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 23:02:19 -0500 On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 02:33:08PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > drow@sources.redhat.com writes: > > | Old Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer > | New Synopsis: [3.2 regression] miscompilation of non-constant structure initializer > | > | Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->drow > | Responsible-Changed-By: drow > | Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 12 17:15:38 2003 > | Responsible-Changed-Why: > | I've checked in a fix to 3.3 and 3.4, so I'm changing the > | title. The testcase from this bug still should be checked > | in; the patch from this bug may be better than mine; and 3.2 > | is still unaddressed. > > Is there a chance to have your patch backported to 3.2 branch? Certainly. I'd already tested the patch on 3.2, so I'm taking this as approval (checked in now). -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer