From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2873 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2003 15:46:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2859 invoked by uid 71); 24 Mar 2003 15:46:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030324154600.2858.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: optimization/7713: Performance regression from gcc 2.95.3 (fwd) Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01599.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/7713; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/7713: Performance regression from gcc 2.95.3 (fwd) Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:42:03 -0600 (CST) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 23:52:22 -0500 From: jlquinn@optonline.net To: bangerth@dealii.org Subject: Re: optimization/7713: Performance regression from gcc 2.95.3 Here is the program. In the makefile, I change the FLAGS to remove -Ofast and replace with the flags in the PR. I didn't CC everything because I wasn't sure you want to glue the tarball to the PR. BTW, if I remember correctly, the slowdown was in 3.2, but not the mainline (pre 3.3) of the time. Jerry