From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-31899-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14124 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2003 19:56:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14096 invoked by uid 71); 24 Mar 2003 19:56:02 -0000
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030324195602.14095.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
Subject: Re: inline-asm/9181: [3.2.1/3.3/3.4 regression] ICE with inline assembly
 in instantiate_virtual_regs_1, at function.c:3974
Reply-To: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01630.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR inline-asm/9181; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mtaylor@fit.edu
Cc:  
Subject: Re: inline-asm/9181: [3.2.1/3.3/3.4 regression] ICE with inline assembly
 in instantiate_virtual_regs_1, at function.c:3974
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:48:47 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9181
 
 The smaller test case:
 
 int
 get_lsb (long long bb)
 {
   int index;
   asm ("": "=%al" (index): "d" (&bb):"%ecx");
   return index;
 }
 
 now gives us:
 
 # gcc-3.3 -c 9181.c
 9181.c: In function `get_lsb':
 9181.c:5: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
 # gcc-3.3 -c 9181.c -O
 # gcc-3.3 -c 9181.c -O2
 
 So at optimize >  0, the whole thing is optimized away.
 At -O0, we used to ICE, that appears to be fixed now.
 Honza (again ;-), is this the expected behavior?
 
 Greetz
 Steven