From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17021 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2003 00:46:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16991 invoked by uid 71); 25 Mar 2003 00:46:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 00:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030325004600.16990.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: c++/10202 Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01646.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10202; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c++/10202 Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:44:13 -0600 (CST) This is most likely the same problem as in 10201, but has a different backtrace. One is for C, the other one for C++. I bet they can be fixed by the same bug. W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/