From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32710 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2003 16:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32600 invoked by uid 71); 25 Mar 2003 16:46:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030325164602.32599.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: ghazi@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Subject: Re: other/6955: collect2 says "core dumped" when there is no core Reply-To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01710.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR other/6955; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" To: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu Cc: bruno@clisp.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: other/6955: collect2 says "core dumped" when there is no core Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:43:25 -0500 (EST) > From: Wolfgang Bangerth > > > > Kaveh, you inserted the lines in question in this PR some > > > 3.5 years ago. Would you mind to take a brief look at this > > > report and its 1-line patch? > > > > Eh? I don't recall filing or modifying this PR. How did you > > determine I was responsible? > > I _made_ you responsible :-) You weren't in any legal sense, I just looked > at the output of "cvs annotate" to find out that you were the one who > checked in the lines of question. This is by now one of the less > successless ways to get patches in PRs reviewed ;-) I hate to be a pedant, but now honor is at stake. :-) I honestly don't think I introduced this error. Looking back at the cvs logs, it came in through one of the many infamous gcc2 merges. It came in over four years ago: "Merge in gcc2 snapshot 19980929". http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/collect2.c.diff?r1=1.62&r2=1.63 -- Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu