From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23316 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2003 17:06:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23298 invoked by uid 48); 25 Mar 2003 17:06:37 -0000 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030325170637.23297.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bkausbk@web.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, bkausbk@web.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: other/10210: Provide better support for mixing att and intel syntax assembler X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01713.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Provide better support for mixing att and intel syntax assembler State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 25 17:06:37 2003 State-Changed-Why: Not relevant to gcc. Please bring this up with the binutils people who are responsible for the gnu assembler. I think it would be helpful if you also provided a rational for your proposal, since I personally fail to see a reason for this. W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10210