From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30542 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2003 17:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30520 invoked by uid 71); 25 Mar 2003 17:16:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030325171600.30516.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Jan Hubicka Subject: Re: other/8286: Missing xmmintrin.h functions Reply-To: Jan Hubicka X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01716.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/8286; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jan Hubicka To: Wolfgang Bangerth Cc: Jan Hubicka , gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, rakdver@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: other/8286: Missing xmmintrin.h functions Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:10:25 +0100 > > > > Synopsis: Missing xmmintrin.h functions > > > Zdenek, at least some of the functions in the list have been > > > added in the meantime. Can you try to update the list of > > > missing symbols? > > > > All of the symbols except for _m_* legacy names are supported now. > > Will they be added sometime (i.e. we should leave the report open), or not > (i.e. the report should be closed)? I think the report should be closed. It is not bug to not support obsoletted API. If we decide on supporting them we don't need the bugreport anyway. Honza > > W. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu > www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/ >