From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11166 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2003 21:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11145 invoked by uid 71); 25 Mar 2003 21:06:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 22:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030325210601.11144.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: ghazi@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Mike Stump Subject: Re: other/6955: collect2 says "core dumped" when there is no core Reply-To: Mike Stump X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01739.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR other/6955; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mike Stump To: Wolfgang Bangerth Cc: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" , bruno@clisp.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: other/6955: collect2 says "core dumped" when there is no core Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 12:59:09 -0800 On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 09:00 AM, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > Well, the line we are talking about is collect2.c:1511. This line has > time > stamp 1999-11-25, CVS version 1.87, which was your commit. Now, I > acknowledge that if I had checked more carefully, then I'd have seen > that > your patch only preserved existing (wrong) behavior, but I haven't > found a > way to get the equivalent of cvs annotate of past versions to see who > really introduced this. cvs diff will tell you. From there, cvs log and look at the comment and the date of the change, and from there, it's back the the ChangeLog entry. Also, the old gcc RCS files can be found on the web site, and can be used to track down things past an old gcc import.