From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32017-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32313 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2003 23:56:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32299 invoked by uid 71); 25 Mar 2003 23:56:00 -0000
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 01:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030325235600.32298.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "David R. Whipple" <vencain@swbell.net>
Subject: Re: c++/10207: Empty structure initialization fails under C++ (but
 works under C)
Reply-To: "David R. Whipple" <vencain@swbell.net>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01747.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/10207; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "David R. Whipple" <vencain@swbell.net>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/10207: Empty structure initialization fails under C++ (but
 works under C)
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:50:02 -0600

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10207
 
 I've subsequently noticed that the sizeof() returns zero for an empty C 
 structure while returning one under C++, presumably playing a role in 
 this problem.  Is there a mechanism to encourage C++ to collapse an 
 empty structure to zero bytes?  If so then perhaps that would circumvent 
 the reported problem.