From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7390 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2003 10:22:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7367 invoked by uid 48); 26 Mar 2003 10:22:56 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030326102256.7366.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: dan.naumov@ofw.fi, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org, dan.naumov@ofw.fi, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ljrittle@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/10030: gcc 3.2(.1) produces broken code with -O2, but not -O X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01786.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: gcc 3.2(.1) produces broken code with -O2, but not -O Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->ljrittle Responsible-Changed-By: ljrittle Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 26 10:22:56 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Mine. (I lowered the severity: Anything so nebulous with a posted workaround is, by default, not critical!) State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: ljrittle State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 26 10:22:56 2003 State-Changed-Why: 9 times out of 10, we never hear from these people again. Please just close ill-formed reports that refer to mega-packages... General Notes: A compiled program crashing at -O2 but not -O does not imply a compiler bug. This is why someone (you) will need to produce a small test case. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10030