From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16230 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2003 12:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16207 invoked by uid 71); 26 Mar 2003 12:16:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 12:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030326121601.16206.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Alan Modra Subject: Re: target/5169: [PA-RISC] Bug in optimizer Reply-To: Alan Modra X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01791.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/5169; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alan Modra To: bangerth@dealii.org, Klaus.k.pedersen@nokia.com, Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, law@redhat.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: target/5169: [PA-RISC] Bug in optimizer Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 22:41:58 +1030 On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 02:33:45AM -0000, bangerth@dealii.org wrote: > Is there any progress on this question? I haven't looked at this particular problem in over a year, but from memory I think there may have been some follow-on posts that stated the underlying problem was inconsistent treatment of paradoxical subregs on WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS machines. My patch should be regarded as a band-aid rather than a proper solution. -- Alan Modra IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre