From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32085-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17645 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2003 17:27:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17625 invoked by uid 48); 26 Mar 2003 17:27:40 -0000
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030326172740.17624.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: aj@suse.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
  pthomas@suse.de
From: bangerth@dealii.org
Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, aj@suse.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, pthomas@suse.de,
  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/10225: [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnamed structs aren't handled correctly
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01815.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Old Synopsis: Unnamed structs aren't handled correctly in 3.3
New Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] Unnamed structs aren't handled correctly

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 26 17:27:39 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Behavior confirmed. I cannot say anything about the validity of
    the code, but we get a message now with 3.3 and mainline,
    where we didn't before. Needs a C language lawyer.
    
    W.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10225