From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26338 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2003 20:46:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26308 invoked by uid 71); 26 Mar 2003 20:46:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030326204601.26307.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Glen Nakamura Subject: Re: optimization/8634: [3.2 regression] incorrect code for inlining of memcpy under -O2 Reply-To: Glen Nakamura X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01834.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/8634; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Glen Nakamura To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/8634: [3.2 regression] incorrect code for inlining of memcpy under -O2 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:36:20 -1000 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8634 Did this PR get changed by mistake? I'm still seeing this problem on the 3.3 branch as of 2003-03-26, but it's not marked as a 3.3 regression anymore... - glen