From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5568 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2003 21:46:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5552 invoked by uid 71); 26 Mar 2003 21:46:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030326214601.5551.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Falk Hueffner Subject: Re: c/10226: unsigned short promotion with bitwise inversion Reply-To: Falk Hueffner X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01840.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/10226; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Falk Hueffner To: Michael Marks Cc: "'Glen Nakamura'" , gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/10226: unsigned short promotion with bitwise inversion Date: 26 Mar 2003 22:39:43 +0100 Michael Marks writes: > Thanks to all of you for the quick response. I think that the > warning misleads because it says ~unsigned to unsigned... correctly > should be short unsigned to int. At least I think so. Indeed. Currently, it says: warning: comparison of promoted ~unsigned with unsigned Suggestion: warning: comparison of ~(promoted unsigned) with unsigned -- Falk