From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32113-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15651 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2003 21:56:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15571 invoked by uid 71); 26 Mar 2003 21:56:00 -0000
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 21:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030326215600.15570.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Glen Nakamura <glen@imodulo.com>
Subject: Re: c/10226: unsigned short promotion with bitwise inversion
Reply-To: Glen Nakamura <glen@imodulo.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01842.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/10226; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Glen Nakamura <glen@imodulo.com>
To: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@student.uni-tuebingen.de>
Cc: Michael Marks <Michael.Marks@internetmachines.com>,
	gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/10226: unsigned short promotion with bitwise inversion
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 11:49:07 -1000

 On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:39:43PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
 > Indeed. Currently, it says:
 > warning: comparison of promoted ~unsigned with unsigned
 > Suggestion:
 > warning: comparison of ~(promoted unsigned) with unsigned
 
 How about one of these:
 warning: comparison of promoted ~unsigned with unsigned is always false
 warning: comparison of ~(promoted unsigned) with unsigned is always false
 
 - glen