From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30544 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2003 00:24:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30526 invoked by uid 48); 27 Mar 2003 00:24:34 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030327002434.30525.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, sayle@gcc.gnu.org, toon@gcc.gnu.org From: sayle@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: sayle@gcc.gnu.org, David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, sayle@gcc.gnu.org, toon@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: fortran/9974: [3.4 regression] Test g77.f-torture/noncompile/check0.f fails X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01859.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [3.4 regression] Test g77.f-torture/noncompile/check0.f fails State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: sayle State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 27 00:24:33 2003 State-Changed-Why: I've now posted a patch to fix this problem at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/msg02162.html It transpires that the problem isn't fortran specific at all, but an optimization bug. My apologies for any inconvenience. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9974