From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30086 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2003 03:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30072 invoked by uid 71); 27 Mar 2003 03:06:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 03:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030327030600.30071.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Ryan Bradetich Subject: Re: c/10215: parisc-linux compiler ICE. Reply-To: Ryan Bradetich X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01868.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/10215; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ryan Bradetich To: Wolfgang Bangerth Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/10215: parisc-linux compiler ICE. Date: 26 Mar 2003 20:03:42 -0700 Wolfgang, According to Randolph it did not work on previous version of gcc for parisc-linux. This statement is part of glibc and is known to compile for powerpc64 and ia64. Randolph modified the program slightly and it does compile this work-around. if (*user_entry != (unsigned int)({long int *tmp = (long int *)_start; tmp[0];})) instead of: if (*user_entry != (unsigned int) (((long int *) _start)[0])) Thanks, - Ryan On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 09:20, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > > GNU C version 3.2.3 20030309 (Debian prerelease) (hppa-linux) > > compiled by GNU C version 3.2.3 20030309 (Debian prerelease). > > rtld.i: In function `dl_main': > > rtld.i:12: unrecognizable insn: > > (insn 13 11 15 (set (reg/f:SI 96) > > (plus:SI (reg:SI 19 %r19) > > (high:SI (symbol_ref/v:SI ("@_start"))))) -1 (nil) > > (nil)) > > rtld.i:12: Internal compiler error in extract_insn, at recog.c:2148 > > Is this something that has worked with past versions of gcc? > > W. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu > www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/ > -- Ryan Bradetich