From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16524 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2003 14:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16510 invoked by uid 71); 27 Mar 2003 14:56:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 15:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030327145600.16509.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction (fwd) Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01907.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/10098; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction (fwd) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:53:29 -0600 (CST) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 23:40:53 -0600 From: Daniel Frankowski To: Wolfgang Bangerth Cc: Giovanni Bajo Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction By the way, only a couple of days later, using the Borland C++ compiler to try to compile the same thing, my computer self-immolated. I got a new CPU, motherboard, case, etc., and I am having much better success compiling now. Thanks again for your help. Dan On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 07:32:41AM -0600, Daniel Frankowski wrote: > Sadly, closing it seems appropriate. Thanks for your help. > > Dan > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 08:18:11PM -0600, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > > > > OK, will do. Thanks > > W. > > > > As a sidenote: when you send messages like the one below (and the previous > > one I got), you make them look as if _I_ have sent them, which is not > > true. Please change this style of quoting. > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Wolfgang Bangerth" > > > To: "Giovanni Bajo" > > > Cc: "Daniel Frankowski" ; > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:23 AM > > > Subject: Re: bootstrap/10098: gcc internal error: illegal instruction > > > > > > Even if it looks very strange to me that unstability of operating system can > > > affect compilation this way, I would tend to close this bug, especially if > > > it works for everything from 3.2 to mainline. But it's your call. > > > > > > Giovanni Bajo > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu > > www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/