The following reply was made to PR c++/10245; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andreas Schwab To: bangerth@dealii.org Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, harri.pasanen@trema.com, jean-paul_marinier@hp.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, tot@trema.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/10245: [3.3/3.4 regression] ?: operator requires public copy constructor of return type Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 18:43:49 +0100 bangerth@dealii.org writes: |> Apparently it wants to make a copy of the return arguments. |> Since at least in Standard C++ (not in Gnu C++) ?: returns |> an rvalue, I don't think this is necessary. ?: returns an lvalue if both expressions have the same type. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."