From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29631 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2003 17:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29613 invoked by uid 71); 27 Mar 2003 17:56:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030327175600.29612.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: c++/10245 Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01923.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/10245; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: Janis Johnson Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/10245 Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:52:03 -0600 (CST) > > PR 10245 might be a target for your regression finder. I bet it's a > > relatively small patch that causes this. > > OK, I've started a hunt using a starting range of the 3.1 branchpoint > and the 3.3 branchpoint. If you've got a narrower interval I can use > that, but otherwise it just means that the hunt runs for an extra > hour or so. It's between 2003-01-17 and 2003-01-30 that this started. W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/