From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19340 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2003 22:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19298 invoked by uid 71); 27 Mar 2003 22:36:01 -0000 Resent-Date: 27 Mar 2003 22:36:01 -0000 Resent-Message-ID: <20030327223601.19297.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, Fulton.Green@Retek.com Received: (qmail 15964 invoked by uid 48); 27 Mar 2003 22:30:44 -0000 Message-Id: <20030327223044.15963.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 22:56:00 -0000 From: Fulton.Green@Retek.com Reply-To: Fulton.Green@Retek.com To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Send-Pr-Version: gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31) Subject: c++/10249: -gxcoff switch causes parser to abort X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01953.txt.bz2 List-Id: >Number: 10249 >Category: c++ >Synopsis: -gxcoff switch causes parser to abort >Confidential: no >Severity: critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: unassigned >State: open >Class: ice-on-legal-code >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Thu Mar 27 22:36:01 UTC 2003 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Fulton.Green@Retek.com >Release: 3.3 20030324 (prerelease) >Organization: >Environment: Chipset: PowerPC 603e Make: IBM Model: F40 OS: AIX 4.3 >Description: Invoking the C++ front-end, specifying XCOFF object output, on a source file containing a simple base class and subclass declaration: $(GCC_HOME)/lib/$(PLATFORM)/$(VERSION)/cc1plus -gxcoff How-To-Repeat.ii generates the following message: :7: internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3228 The referenced tree.c is in $GCCSRC/gcc, NOT $GCCSRC/gcc/cp. The ICE disappears if the -gxcoff switch is removed. >How-To-Repeat: // filename: How-To-Repeat.ii // a simple base class and subclass declaration // // compile with -gxcoff (assuming the compiler has // support for it) to reproduce the problem class BaseClass { int x; }; class Subclass : public BaseClass { int y; }; >Fix: Choose one: - don't declare subclasses - don't use the -gxcoff switch >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: