From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3679 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2003 10:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3632 invoked by uid 71); 28 Mar 2003 10:16:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 10:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030328101602.3631.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Eric Botcazou Subject: Re: optimization/9123: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression ] Internal compiler error in do_SUBST at combine.c:434 Reply-To: Eric Botcazou X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01987.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/9123; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eric Botcazou To: jason@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, khindenburg@cherrynebula.net, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/9123: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression ] Internal compiler error in do_SUBST at combine.c:434 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 11:17:31 +0100 > Not a c++-specific bug; it's dying because it's trying to substitute > (unsigned char)-1 for a QI reg, but combine doesn't like that because > (HOST_WIDE_INT)255 != (HOST_WIDE_INT)-1. Here's a C testcase: > > typedef unsigned char T; > inline T clamp (T in, T min, T max) > { > return in <= min ? min : in >= max ? max : in; > } > unsigned char f (int i) > { > return clamp (i, 0, 255); > } On which versions and with which options does this C testcase fail? -- Eric Botcazou