From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32259-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11194 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2003 10:45:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11175 invoked by uid 48); 28 Mar 2003 10:45:52 -0000
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 10:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030328104552.11174.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: beszedes@rgai.hu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
From: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org
Reply-To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, beszedes@rgai.hu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: middle-end/9967: Some standard C function calls should not be replaced when optimizing for size
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg01989.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: Some standard C function calls should not be replaced when optimizing for size

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: ebotcazou
State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 28 10:45:51 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    On submitter's request.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9967