From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32274-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5739 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2003 17:16:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5724 invoked by uid 71); 28 Mar 2003 17:16:01 -0000
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 17:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030328171601.5723.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/9123: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression ] Internal compiler
 error in do_SUBST at combine.c:434
Reply-To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg02004.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/9123; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, khindenburg@cherrynebula.net, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/9123: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression ] Internal compiler
 error in do_SUBST at combine.c:434
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 11:57:02 -0500

 On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 11:17:31 +0100, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> wrote:
 
 > On which versions and with which options does this C testcase fail?
 
 Hmm, I seem to have attached the wrong C testcase.  To fail, it needs
 consts.  It fails with 3.2 and 3.3, but seems to be fixed on the trunk.
 
 typedef unsigned char T;
 inline T clamp (const T in, const T min, const T max)
 {
   return in <= min ? min : in >= max ? max : in;
 }
 unsigned char f (int i)
 {
   return clamp (i, 0, 255);
 }