From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12380 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2003 11:50:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12356 invoked by uid 48); 29 Mar 2003 11:50:27 -0000 Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 13:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030329115027.12355.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gerald@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schnetter@uni-tuebingen.de From: gerald@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: gerald@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gerald@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schnetter@uni-tuebingen.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: web/10254: Explain binary compatibility to other vendors' compilers X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg02048.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Explain binary compatibility to other vendors' compilers Responsible-Changed-From-To: gerald->unassigned Responsible-Changed-By: gerald Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 29 11:50:27 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Undo automatic assignment of this bug to myself. Also, filing something like this as a doc-bug ("The documentation is incorrect") is certainly not correct, this merely being an enhancement request. Accordingly, also downgrade priority. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10254