From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19379 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2003 04:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19365 invoked by uid 71); 30 Mar 2003 04:56:00 -0000 Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 08:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030330045600.19364.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Subject: Re: middle-end/9967: Some standard C function calls should not be replaced when optimizing for size Reply-To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg02053.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR middle-end/9967; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" To: beszedes@cc.u-szeged.hu, beszedes@rgai.hu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: middle-end/9967: Some standard C function calls should not be replaced when optimizing for size Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 23:49:33 -0500 (EST) > From: Arpad Beszedes > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9967 > > This PR can be closed, because a patch has been implemented and applied > to 3.3 and mainline: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-03/threads.html#00425 FYI, Gaby approved it for 3.2.3 via private email, and I've just applied the patch there too. -- Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu