From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32357-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 1172 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2003 04:16:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1152 invoked by uid 71); 31 Mar 2003 04:16:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 04:18:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030331041601.1146.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
Subject: Re: target/6882: [SPARC] Useless stack adjustment code
Reply-To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg02087.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR target/6882; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org,  <dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu>, 
     <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,  <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,  <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>, 
     <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/6882: [SPARC] Useless stack adjustment code
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 23:15:52 -0500 (EST)

 On 29 Mar 2003 ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     The prologue is always emitted if assembly code is emitted for the function.
 
 No, it seems a valid optimization request to not emit the
 stack-adjustment code.  Could you find a *specific* reason for
 the stack-adjustment code?  (Please state that in the PR.)
 I'll re-open this PR.
 
 brgds, H-P