From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32372-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32696 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2003 12:46:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 32654 invoked by uid 71); 31 Mar 2003 12:46:00 -0000
Resent-Date: 31 Mar 2003 12:46:00 -0000
Resent-Message-ID: <20030331124600.32653.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, carlo@alinoe.com
Received: (qmail 29544 invoked by uid 48); 31 Mar 2003 12:36:03 -0000
Message-Id: <20030331123603.29543.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:36:00 -0000
From: carlo@alinoe.com
Reply-To: carlo@alinoe.com
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
X-Send-Pr-Version: gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31)
Subject: libstdc++/10276: memory leak for stringstream / ios_base callback cache.
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg02103.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>


>Number:         10276
>Category:       libstdc++
>Synopsis:       memory leak for stringstream / ios_base callback cache.
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Mar 31 12:46:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Carlo Wood
>Release:        3.3 branch
>Organization:
>Environment:
i686-gnu-linux
>Description:
The following code snippet leaks memory:

  for (int i = 0; i < 1000; ++i)
  {
    std::ostringstream s;
  }

this results in 1000 undeleted allocations that made
with 'new' in respectively ios.cc and basic_ios.tcc
at:

ios.cc:

  void
  ios_base::register_callback(event_callback __fn, int __index)
  { _M_callbacks = new _Callback_list(__fn, __index, _M_callbacks); }

and

bits/basic_ios.tcc:

      if (!pword(0)) {
        pword(0) = auto_ptr<__cache_t>(new __cache_t()).release();
        register_callback(__cache_t::_S_callback, 0);
      }


Can someone please make this high priority?
Its a regression and I really think that it
MUST be fixed before 3.3 is released.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: