From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-32392-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16430 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2003 16:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16416 invoked by uid 71); 31 Mar 2003 16:26:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030331162601.16415.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Warren_Baird@cimmetry.com
Subject: Re: optimization/10258: byteswapping code fails in -O2
Reply-To: Warren_Baird@cimmetry.com
X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg02122.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10258; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Warren_Baird@cimmetry.com
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/10258: byteswapping code fails in -O2
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:19:48 -0500

 Yeah, it looks like the -fno-strict-aliasing solves the problem.  Sorry about
 that...
 
 Warren