From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28116 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2003 19:18:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28095 invoked by uid 48); 31 Mar 2003 19:18:26 -0000 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 19:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030331191826.28094.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: cgd@broadcom.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rsandifo@sources.redhat.com From: rsandifo@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: rsandifo@sources.redhat.com, cgd@broadcom.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rsandifo@sources.redhat.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/9301: [regression] [mips-linux] gcc 3.2.1 SEGV in try_forward_edges X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg02138.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [regression] [mips-linux] gcc 3.2.1 SEGV in try_forward_edges Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rsandifo Responsible-Changed-By: rsandifo Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Mar 31 19:18:26 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: mine State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: rsandifo State-Changed-When: Mon Mar 31 19:18:26 2003 State-Changed-Why: Do you know if this is still a problem? I can't reproduce it with the head of gcc-3_2-branch using an i686-pc-linux-gnu cross mipsel-linux-gnu compiler (tried -EB -O2 as well as -O2). I can't reproduce with gcc 3.3 or trunk either. I'll try a native compiler as well as a pristine 3.2.1 build. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9301