From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3897 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2003 20:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3873 invoked by uid 71); 31 Mar 2003 20:16:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030331201600.3872.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: rsandifo@sources.redhat.com Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: cgd@broadcom.com Subject: Re: optimization/9301: [regression] [mips-linux] gcc 3.2.1 SEGV in try_forward_edges Reply-To: cgd@broadcom.com X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg02143.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/9301; it has been noted by GNATS. From: cgd@broadcom.com To: rsandifo@sources.redhat.com Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, rsandifo@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: optimization/9301: [regression] [mips-linux] gcc 3.2.1 SEGV in try_forward_edges Date: 31 Mar 2003 12:07:23 -0800 At 31 Mar 2003 19:18:26 -0000, rsandifo@sources.redhat.com wrote: > Do you know if this is still a problem? > > I can't reproduce it with the head of gcc-3_2-branch using > an i686-pc-linux-gnu cross mipsel-linux-gnu compiler (tried > -EB -O2 as well as -O2). I can't reproduce with gcc 3.3 > or trunk either. > > I'll try a native compiler as well as a pristine 3.2.1 build. I just tried 3.2.2 (plus local mods) and it seems to work fine. the patch: > 2003-02-03 Eric Botcazou > > PR ice-on-legal-code/9493 > * cfgcleanup.c (try_forward_edges): Check for null insn. might have done it; i dunno i didn't analyze it further. i looked at a .o that resulted from compiling the file, it looked OK (as far as I could tell, on a quick read). Now that it works, IMO this test should be thrown into the testsuite as a compilation test. chris