From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23420 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2003 05:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23398 invoked by uid 71); 1 Apr 2003 05:26:01 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 05:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030401052601.23396.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Greg Schafer Subject: Re: other/9479: ld --version parsing in gcc configury fails on latest FSF binutils-2.13.2.1 Reply-To: Greg Schafer X-SW-Source: 2003-04/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR other/9479; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Greg Schafer To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: other/9479: ld --version parsing in gcc configury fails on latest FSF binutils-2.13.2.1 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:21:44 +1000 As mentioned in this post:- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-02/msg00329.html the 2nd set of patches are incorrect and should not be applied. However, the original patch IS correct and was applied to 3.2.2 but is still not applied to the 3.3 and 3.4 branches. Here is where Jakub reviewed the original patch:- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2003-01/msg01712.html And here is where it got applied:- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2003-02/msg00143.html This needs to be applied to gcc-3.3 before release! Greg